DevSecOps Architecture with AI Assistants

System design patterns, agent responsibilities, and integration architecture for AI-assisted DevSecOps.

System Design Patterns

The Agent Pantheon in DevSecOps Context

When using oh-my-opencode-slim, each agent maps to specific DevSecOps responsibilities:

flowchart TD
    subgraph DEVSECOPS["DEVSECOPS WORKFLOW"]
        direction TB
        O[Orchestrator<br/>Main interface<br/>routes tasks]
    end
    
    O --> E[Explorer<br/>Codebase<br/>Mapping]
    O --> L[Librarian<br/>External<br/>Research]
    O --> Or[Oracle<br/>Strategic<br/>Architecture]
    O --> F[Fixer<br/>Implementation<br/>Tasks]
    O --> D[Designer<br/>UI/UX<br/>Polish]
    O --> C[Council<br/>Multi-model<br/>Consensus]
    
    style DEVSECOPS fill:#1f2937,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style O fill:#7c3aed,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style E fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style L fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style Or fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style F fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style D fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style C fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px

Agent Responsibilities in DevSecOps

AgentDevSecOps RoleTypical Tasks
OrchestratorSecurity CoordinatorTask routing, context management, final decisions
ExplorerAsset DiscoveryMap attack surface, find secrets, inventory IaC
LibrarianThreat IntelCVE lookups, security advisory research, compliance docs
OracleSecurity ArchitectRisk assessment, threat modeling, architecture review
FixerRemediation EngineerAuto-patch vulnerabilities, update configs, refactor code
DesignerSecurity UXSecurity dashboards, alert interfaces, documentation
CouncilRed Team ConsensusMulti-model security validation, attack simulation

Workflow Patterns

Pattern 1: Continuous Security Assessment

flowchart LR
    subgraph Trigger["Trigger: Code push or schedule"]
        direction LR
        T[Start]
    end
    
    T --> E[Explorer<br/>Map codebase<br/>changes]
    E --> |Identify new files<br/>dependencies<br/>configurations| Or[Oracle<br/>Assess risk]
    Or --> |Analyze attack surface<br/>Prioritize concerns| L[Librarian<br/>Research<br/>threats]
    L --> |Check CVEs<br/>Review advisories| F[Fixer<br/>Auto-remediate<br/>if safe]
    F --> |Update deps<br/>Apply patches<br/>Refactor| C[Council<br/>Validate<br/>high-risk]
    C --> |Multi-model review<br/>Consensus| End[End]
    
    style Trigger fill:#1f2937,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style E fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style Or fill:#d97706,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style L fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style F fill:#dc2626,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style C fill:#7c3aed,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style End fill:#1f2937,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px

Pattern 2: Incident Response

flowchart LR
    subgraph Trigger["Trigger: Security alert or breach"]
        direction LR
        T[Start]
    end
    
    T --> E[Explorer<br/>Immediate<br/>reconnaissance]
    E --> |Find affected<br/>systems<br/>Map blast radius| L[Librarian<br/>Rapid<br/>research]
    L --> |Look up<br/>attack vectors<br/>Find mitigations| Or[Oracle<br/>Strategic<br/>response]
    Or --> |Assess containment<br/>Plan remediation| F[Fixer<br/>Execute<br/>fixes]
    F --> |Apply patches<br/>Update rules<br/>Rotate creds| D[Designer<br/>Document<br/>incident]
    D --> |Create timeline<br/>Generate template| End[End]
    
    style Trigger fill:#1f2937,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style E fill:#dc2626,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style L fill:#dc2626,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style Or fill:#d97706,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style F fill:#dc2626,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style D fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style End fill:#1f2937,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px

Pattern 3: Compliance Automation

flowchart LR
    subgraph Trigger["Trigger: Audit requirement or policy update"]
        direction LR
        T[Start]
    end
    
    T --> L[Librarian<br/>Research<br/>standards]
    L --> |Fetch requirements<br/>Map to controls| E[Explorer<br/>Find<br/>evidence]
    E --> |Scan IaC<br/>Document state| Or[Oracle<br/>Gap<br/>analysis]
    Or --> |Compare current<br/>vs required<br/>Prioritize| F[Fixer<br/>Implement<br/>controls]
    F --> |Add security<br/>controls<br/>Update policies| C[Council<br/>Validate<br/>compliance]
    C --> |Multi-model<br/>review posture| End[End]
    
    style Trigger fill:#1f2937,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style L fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style E fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style Or fill:#d97706,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style F fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style C fill:#7c3aed,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style End fill:#1f2937,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px

Integration Architecture

With Existing DevSecOps Toolchain

flowchart TD
    subgraph Platform["DEVSECOPS PLATFORM"]
        direction TB
        
        subgraph Scanners["Security Scanners"]
            direction LR
            SAST[SAST<br/>Scanner]
            DAST[DAST<br/>Scanner]
            SEC[Secrets<br/>Scanner]
            IAC[IaC<br/>Scanner]
        end
        
        AI[AI Assistant<br/>oh-my-opencode-slim<br/>Analysis]
        
        subgraph Outputs["Integrations"]
            direction LR
            SIEM[SIEM<br/>Splunk<br/>Datadog]
            TKT[Ticketing<br/>Jira]
            CICD[CI/CD<br/>Pipeline]
        end
        
        Scanners --> AI
        AI --> SIEM
        AI --> TKT
        AI --> CICD
    end
    
    style Platform fill:#1f2937,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style Scanners fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style SAST fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style DAST fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style SEC fill:#dc2626,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style IAC fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style AI fill:#7c3aed,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style Outputs fill:#d97706,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style SIEM fill:#d97706,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style TKT fill:#d97706,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style CICD fill:#d97706,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px

Data Flow Security

flowchart LR
    subgraph Input["User Input"]
        direction LR
        UI[User<br/>Input]
    end
    
    subgraph Filter1["Local Filter"]
        direction TB
        F1[.gitignore<br/>Patterns<br/>PII Filter]
    end
    
    subgraph AI["AI Assistant"]
        direction TB
        A[oh-my-opencode-slim<br/>Analysis]
    end
    
    subgraph Filter2["Local Sanitization"]
        direction TB
        F2[Command<br/>Review<br/>Human]
    end
    
    subgraph Output["Output"]
        direction LR
        O[Output]
    end
    
    UI --> F1 --> A --> F2 --> O
    
    style Input fill:#1f2937,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style UI fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style Filter1 fill:#d97706,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style F1 fill:#d97706,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style AI fill:#7c3aed,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style A fill:#7c3aed,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style Filter2 fill:#d97706,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style F2 fill:#d97706,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style Output fill:#1f2937,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
    style O fill:#059669,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px

Configuration Architecture

Multi-Provider Cost Optimization

{
  "agents": {
    "orchestrator": {
      "model": "openai/gpt-5.4",
      "purpose": "Strategic decisions, complex security analysis"
    },
    "explorer": {
      "model": "cerebras/zai-glm-4.7",
      "purpose": "Fast codebase scanning, low cost"
    },
    "oracle": {
      "model": "openai/gpt-5.4 (high)",
      "purpose": "Deep security architecture review"
    },
    "librarian": {
      "model": "openai/gpt-5.4-mini",
      "purpose": "Documentation lookups, CVE research"
    },
    "fixer": {
      "model": "fireworks-ai/kimi-k2p5-turbo",
      "purpose": "Fast implementation, routine fixes"
    },
    "council": {
      "models": ["openai/gpt-5.4", "anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet", "google/gemini-1.5-pro"],
      "purpose": "Multi-model consensus on critical security decisions"
    }
  }
}

MCP (Model Context Protocol) Integration

Security-Focused MCP Servers

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "security-advisories": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@security/mcp-advisories"]
    },
    "github-security": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://api.github.com/advisories",
      "auth": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}"
    },
    "terraform-docs": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@hashicorp/mcp-terraform"]
    },
    "kubernetes-api": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "kubectl",
      "args": ["mcp-server"]
    }
  }
}

Scalability Patterns

From Individual to Enterprise

ScalePatternTools
IndividualLocal CLI + local modelsShellGPT + Ollama
TeamShared configs + centralized policiesoh-my-opencode-slim + shared git repo
EnterpriseFederated agents + governance layerCustom orchestration + audit logging

Session Management at Scale

# Enterprise session patterns
sessions:
  security-audit:
    retention: 90_days
    logging: required
    approval: security_lead
  
  incident-response:
    retention: 1_year
    logging: required
    approval: auto
    
  routine-ops:
    retention: 7_days
    logging: optional
    approval: none

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  1. The “Yolo” Mode: Never use --yolo or equivalent in production
  2. Over-Delegation: Don’t route trivial tasks through complex multi-agent flows
  3. Context Bleed: Isolate sensitive and non-sensitive contexts
  4. Model Over-Reliance: Always have human review for security-critical changes
  5. Audit Blindness: Never disable logging for security workflows