<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Approaches on AI-Assisted DevSecOps Workflows</title><link>https://adurrr.github.io/ai-devsecops-workflows/tags/approaches/</link><description>Recent content in Approaches on AI-Assisted DevSecOps Workflows</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><atom:link href="https://adurrr.github.io/ai-devsecops-workflows/tags/approaches/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Paradigms: Approaches to AI-Assisted DevSecOps</title><link>https://adurrr.github.io/ai-devsecops-workflows/docs/paradigms/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://adurrr.github.io/ai-devsecops-workflows/docs/paradigms/</guid><description>&lt;div class="alert alert-info" role="alert"&gt;&lt;div class="h4 alert-heading" role="heading"&gt;Choosing the Right Paradigm&lt;/div&gt;


Start with the simplest paradigm that fits your task. Use CLI for quick commands, pair programming for focused development, and multi-agent for complex security audits.
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div class="alert alert-warning" role="alert"&gt;&lt;div class="h4 alert-heading" role="heading"&gt;Security Review Requirements&lt;/div&gt;


All security-critical decisions require human approval. Enable Council mode for high-stakes changes and never auto-execute destructive operations in production.
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;h2 id="overview"&gt;Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three primary paradigms have emerged for integrating AI assistants into DevSecOps workflows. Each offers distinct trade-offs between automation, control, and security.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>